特許法第35条
Employee Inventions (Article 35, Patent Act)
職務発明
Plain-language explanation
Please note an important limitation: the retrieved materials provided to generate this explanation only contained the text of Trademark Act Article 35 (rules on pledges, co-ownership, and registration effects applied by reference), Design Act Article 35 (restrictions on exercising a design right when a pledge is set), and Patent Act Article 20 (succession of procedural effects). The actual text of Patent Act Article 35 (Employee Inventions) was not included in the retrieved data, so a precise, text-based explanation cannot be given here with full accuracy.
Generally speaking, Patent Act Article 35 is well known as the core provision governing "employee inventions" (shokumu hatsumei) — inventions made by employees in the course of their job duties. It typically addresses questions such as: whether the employer automatically obtains rights to use the invention, whether the employer can require advance assignment of the patent right to the company, and what "reasonable benefit" (compensation) the employee-inventor is entitled to receive in exchange. This article is central to any company's IP policy, employment invention regulations, and R&D contracts, since it balances the employer's investment in R&D infrastructure against the individual inventor's contribution.
Because the precise wording matters a great deal (e.g., thresholds for what counts as a duty-related invention, procedures for setting compensation, and requirements for consultation with employees), businesses and lawyers should confirm the current official text directly and consult a qualified Japanese patent attorney (benrishi) or IP lawyer before drafting or relying on internal employee invention rules. Related provisions on ownership, transfer, and registration effects of patent-adjacent rights (as cross-referenced in Trademark Act Art. 35) and on succession of procedural effects (Patent Act Art. 20) can become relevant when a company later needs to formally register or transfer rights originating from an employee invention.
日本語での解説
ご注意ください:提供された検索結果には、商標法第35条(質権・共有等の準用規定)、意匠法第35条(質権設定時の実施権の制限)、および特許法第20条(手続の承継効)の条文しか含まれておらず、お尋ねの「特許法第35条(職務発明)」の実際の条文本文は含まれていませんでした。そのため、条文の正確な文言に基づく詳細な解説は現時点では提供できません。
一般的に「特許法第35条」は、従業員が職務上行った発明(職務発明)について、使用者(会社)がどのような権利を持つか、また従業員にどのような対価(相当の利益)を与えるべきかを定める重要な条文として知られています。企業の知財戦略や職務発明規程の作成において頻繁に参照される条文ですが、正確な適用にあたっては必ず最新の条文原文をご確認いただくか、専門家にご相談ください。
なお、関連する制度として、特許権の共有・移転・登録の効果に関する規定(商標法第35条が準用する特許法第73条・第76条・第98条)や、手続の承継効を定める特許法第20条は、職務発明により生じた特許権が使用者に承継される場面などで関連して問題となることがあります。
Common scenarios
- ▸A company sets up an employee invention compensation program and needs to confirm how much 'reasonable benefit' must be paid to inventors
- ▸An employee creates a patentable invention while working in the R&D department and the company wants to secure ownership of the patent right
- ▸A startup drafts its employment agreements and IP assignment policies to pre-emptively secure rights to future employee inventions
- ▸A departing employee disputes the compensation received for an invention made during their employment
- ▸A company merges with another and needs to determine how existing employee invention rights and obligations transfer to the new entity
Related statutes
- 特許法第20条
- 商標法第35条
- 意匠法第35条
- 特許法第73条
Does this affect your contract?
Hanko AI reviews your contracts against 特許法第35条 and other Japanese statutes in under 60 seconds.
Review your contract free →Generated by Hanko AI from the official Japanese statute corpus. A general statutory reference for the practising attorney. Confirm the current statute against the facts of your matter.