借地借家法第28条
Requirements for Refusal to Renew a Building Lease (Legitimate Grounds / "Seito Jiyu")
建物賃貸借契約の更新拒絶等の要件(正当事由)
Plain-language explanation
Article 28 of the Act on Land and Building Leases requires that a landlord who wants to refuse renewal of a building lease, or who wants to terminate a lease with no fixed term, must have "legitimate grounds" (seito jiyu) — not merely a desire to end the tenancy. Courts weigh several factors together: (1) how much the landlord and tenant (including subtenants) each genuinely need to use the building, (2) the history and circumstances of the lease relationship, (3) how the building has actually been used, (4) the physical condition of the building, and (5) whether the landlord has offered to pay relocation/compensation money (立退料, "tachinokiryo").
This provision is designed to protect tenants from being evicted simply because a lease term has expired. In practice, a landlord's claim that they need the space for their own use is rarely sufficient on its own; courts often look favorably on landlords who also offer reasonable compensation money and give tenants adequate time and support to relocate.
For business owners, this article is critical in two directions. If you are a landlord planning to redevelop a building, convert it to another use, or bring in a new tenant, you should expect that ending an existing commercial lease will likely require negotiation and probably payment of compensation — court battles over "legitimate grounds" are common and landlord-favorable outcomes are far from guaranteed. If you are a tenant (e.g., a retail store or office lessee) facing non-renewal, this article gives you real leverage to negotiate for relocation compensation or additional time, since the landlord cannot simply refuse to renew without meeting this legal threshold.
日本語での解説
借地借家法第28条は、建物の賃貸人(大家)が賃貸借契約の更新を拒絶したり、期間の定めのない賃貸借の解約を申し入れたりする場合には、単に「更新したくない」というだけでは足りず、「正当な事由」が必要であることを定めた条文です。判断にあたっては、①建物の賃貸人および賃借人(転借人を含む)が建物の使用を必要とする事情、②建物の賃貸借に関する従前の経過、③建物の利用状況、④建物の現況、⑤立退料の申し出、といった事情が総合的に考慮されます。
この条文は、借主を保護するための強行規定的な性格を持ち、大家が「契約期間が満了したから」という理由だけで一方的に借主を追い出すことを防ぐ役割を果たしています。実務上は、大家が自己使用の必要性を主張しても、それだけでは正当事由が認められにくく、立退料の提供や借主側の生活・営業への配慮などが重視される傾向にあります。
企業のオフィス移転計画や店舗テナントの入れ替えを検討する際、貸主側は「正当事由」のハードルの高さを事前に理解しておく必要があります。逆に借主側(テナント)にとっては、この条文が事実上の「居座り」交渉材料になり得るため、立退料交渉の際の法的根拠として重要です。
Common scenarios
- ▸A landlord wants to end a commercial store lease to redevelop the building into a larger property and must negotiate legitimate grounds and compensation with the tenant
- ▸A retail tenant receives a non-renewal notice and disputes it, using Article 28 as leverage to negotiate a higher payout (立退料) before agreeing to vacate
- ▸An office building owner wants to reclaim floor space for the owner's own business use and must demonstrate genuine necessity, not just preference
- ▸A landlord attempts to terminate a periodic (non-fixed-term) lease mid-relationship and must show legitimate grounds rather than simply giving notice
- ▸A property investor purchasing a building with sitting tenants needs to assess how difficult and costly it will be to remove tenants for renovation or resale
Related statutes
- 借地借家法第26条
- 借地借家法第27条
- 借地借家法第30条
- 民法第617条
Does this affect your contract?
Hanko AI reviews your contracts against 借地借家法第28条 and other Japanese statutes in under 60 seconds.
Review your contract free →Generated by Hanko AI from the official Japanese statute corpus. A general statutory reference for the practising attorney. Confirm the current statute against the facts of your matter.