民法第587条
Consumption Loan (Loan for Consumption)
消費貸借
Plain-language explanation
Article 587 of the Civil Code defines a "loan for consumption" (消費貸借) — the classic example being a loan of money, but it also covers loans of fungible goods like rice or oil, where the borrower returns the same type, quality, and quantity rather than the exact same item. This is the legal basis for ordinary borrowing and lending of cash between individuals, friends, or businesses.
The key structural point is that this is a "real contract" (要物契約): a mere promise to lend — "I'll lend you ¥1 million" — does not by itself create a binding loan obligation under this article. The contract only takes legal effect once the lender actually hands over the money or goods to the borrower. Until that handover happens, there's no enforceable duty to repay, and arguably no enforceable duty for the lender to actually deliver the funds either, under this article alone.
This matters in practice: if a business owner verbally agrees to lend a supplier money but never transfers it, Article 587 alone won't force them to follow through. That's why the related Article 587-2 is critical — it creates an exception allowing loans made in writing (or electronic record) to become binding upon mere agreement to deliver, even before money changes hands, while giving the borrower a right to cancel until they actually receive the funds. In business financing — bank loans, intercompany loans, shareholder loans — parties almost always use written loan agreements (金銭消費貸借契約書) precisely to lock in enforceability before cash actually moves, and to clearly fix interest rates, repayment schedules, and default terms.
日本語での解説
民法第587条は「消費貸借」契約、すなわちお金や米・油のような代替可能な物を借りて、後で同じ種類・品質・数量のものを返す契約について定めています。典型例は金銭の貸し借り(借金)ですが、条文上は物の貸し借り(例:同じ銘柄・量の米を借りて後で返す)も含まれます。
重要なポイントは、この契約が「要物契約」として構成されている点です。つまり、単に「貸します」「借ります」と口約束しただけでは契約は成立せず、実際に金銭その他の物を相手方から受け取った時点で初めて契約の効力が生じます。逆に言えば、まだお金を受け取っていない段階では、法的な返還義務は発生しません。
ただし、この原則には重要な例外があります。次条(587条の2)により、書面(または電磁的記録)で消費貸借契約を結んだ場合は、実際に金銭を受け取る前でも、引渡しの合意だけで契約は有効に成立します。そのため実務上、企業間の融資契約や個人間の借用書を伴う貸し借りでは、書面化することで「貸すと約束したのに実行してもらえない」というリスクを回避できます。中小企業が銀行や取引先から運転資金を借り入れる際、金銭消費貸借契約書を交わすのはこの規定を踏まえた実務です。
Common scenarios
- ▸中小企業が銀行から運転資金を借り入れる際の金銭消費貸借契約書の作成
- ▸会社が役員や株主から一時的に資金を借り入れる(役員借入金)
- ▸個人間での現金の貸し借りとその返済トラブル
- ▸取引先間で原材料や商品(代替可能な物)を一時的に融通し合う契約
- ▸書面契約前に資金交付を拒否された場合の法的救済の検討
Related statutes
- 民法第587条の2
- 民法第589条
- 民法第590条
- 民法第591条
Does this affect your contract?
Hanko AI reviews your contracts against 民法第587条 and other Japanese statutes in under 60 seconds.
Review your contract free →Generated by Hanko AI from the official Japanese statute corpus. A general statutory reference for the practising attorney. Confirm the current statute against the facts of your matter.