Hanko AI›Japanese Law Guide›民法第548条の2

民法第548条の2

Agreement to Standard Form Contract Terms (Teikei Yakkan)

定型約款の合意

Plain-language explanation

This article establishes how "standard form contract terms" (teikei yakkan) — like terms of service, insurance policies, or transportation carriage rules — legally bind parties even when the other side hasn't read every clause. A "teikei torihiki" (standard-form transaction) is one where a business deals with many unspecified customers on uniform terms that make sense for both sides given the nature of the business (e.g., a SaaS subscription, a train ticket, an insurance contract).

Paragraph 1 says a party is deemed to have agreed to all individual clauses in the standard terms if either: (1) they agreed that the standard terms would govern the contract, or (2) the business preparing the terms had announced in advance that the standard terms would apply. Practically, this means clicking "I agree" to a terms-of-service page — without reading the fine print — is generally enough to bind the customer to the whole document.

However, Paragraph 2 provides a crucial safeguard: any clause that unreasonably restricts the customer's rights or imposes excessive burdens, and which — considering the nature of the transaction, actual circumstances, and general business norms — violates the good faith principle (Article 1, Paragraph 2) by one-sidedly harming the customer's interests, is treated as NOT agreed to, even if it appears in the standard terms. This means businesses cannot hide unfair or abusive clauses (e.g., excessive penalty fees, unreasonable liability waivers, hidden auto-renewal traps) in boilerplate terms and expect them to be enforceable — courts can strike such clauses down. For business owners, this means drafting terms of service or contracts requires balancing enforceability with fairness; for those on the receiving end, it means unfair clauses buried in fine print may not hold up even if technically "agreed to."

日本語での解説

この条文は、利用規約やサービス契約書のような「定型約款」がどのようにして契約内容として法的拘束力を持つのかを定めたルールです。ここでいう「定型取引」とは、事業者が不特定多数の相手と行う取引で、内容を画一的にすることが双方にとって合理的なもの(例:オンラインサービスの利用規約、公共交通機関の運送約款、保険契約など)を指します。

第1項では、①「約款を契約内容にする」と合意した場合、または②約款準備者が事前に「これを契約内容にする」と相手方に表示していた場合には、相手方が約款の個別条項を読んでいなくても、その内容全体に合意したものとみなされると定めています。つまり、ユーザーが利用規約の全文を読まずに「同意する」ボタンを押しただけでも、原則として拘束されるということです。

ただし第2項は重要な例外を設けています。相手方の権利を不当に制限したり義務を過重にしたりする条項で、取引の実情や社会通念に照らして信義則(第1条第2項)に反し、相手方の利益を一方的に害すると認められるものは、たとえ形式上合意したとみなされても「合意しなかったもの」として無効になります。これにより、事業者が一方的に不利な条件を約款に紛れ込ませることへの歯止めがかけられています。実務上、事業者は約款の内容が合理的であるかを常に意識する必要があり、消費者や取引先も不当条項があれば無効を主張できる余地があります。

Common scenarios

  • ▸A SaaS or app company drafts terms of service that users accept via a checkbox before signing up
  • ▸An insurance company relies on its standard policy wording to define coverage and exclusions
  • ▸A railway or bus company's carriage conditions govern passenger liability and refund rules
  • ▸An e-commerce platform includes a clause limiting its liability for late delivery or defective products
  • ▸A telecom provider includes an auto-renewal or cancellation-fee clause in its subscriber agreement

Related statutes

Does this affect your contract?

Hanko AI reviews your contracts against 民法第548条の2 and other Japanese statutes in under 60 seconds.

Review your contract free →

Generated by Hanko AI from the official Japanese statute corpus. A general statutory reference for the practising attorney. Confirm the current statute against the facts of your matter.

Agreement to Standard Form Contract Terms (Teikei Yakkan) | 民法第548条の2 | Hanko AI | Hanko AI 判断